Hans Efde wrote:That rear spoiler is hideous, I would cut it off. The gelcoat is thick enough to sand it down to a healthy piece and then use finer and finer (wet) sandpaper until you can use T-cut and get it shiny again. I had acid stains on my bonnet (previous owner had a leaking battery, got it on his hands and put his hands on the bonnet). The acid damaged the gelcoat and made green stains on my blue bonnet. By sanding it carefully down until the green stains were gone and work my way up with finer abrasive materials I was able to remove it completely.
The same applies to all stains and dull spots in the gelcoat, as long as you don't go through the gelcoat, you can get the car shiny again.
p.s. nice Rover 200 instrument cluster, much better than the square Metro dash. Only too bad the donor vehicle was a pre -85 Metro, no intermittent wiper (as far as I can see) and the pressure limiter for the rear brakes is not on the m/c, somust be on the rear subframe.
That's encouraging, although I have seen far worse spoilers added to Midases! I have to say I prefer the Rover 200 instrument cluster too, and you're correct; no intermittent wipe; although in the paperwork with the car there are invoices from a garage which mention fitting an intermittent wipe facility. I'd need to have a closer look. Also, the indicator telltales in the cluster are almost out of sight, but there's so much padding on the dash that it may be simple to cure that.
Owner mentioned that the voltage regulator is broken, and the wiring to the fuel tank sender is missing, so some remedial work required there.
Two useful items with this car are the front and rear undertrays, although the current ride height means the flanges at the outer edges of the front tray are only about 3" above ground level. I would need to increase that somehow, my house is 2 miles up a forest track. 3" of ground clearance isn't enough for that - and the owner mentions that a careful approach to speed humps is required. The rear tray isn't fitted because of the exhaust system fitted, the rear box is fore-and-aft, not transverse, and it exits into twin tailpipes, one each side. However, it's stainless, so I'd be reluctant to replace it unless an alternative was cheaply available.
Is it possible to fit the post-85 m/c and eliminate the remote pressure limiter?