by ACourtney » Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:47 pm
Hi Allan,
I have fitted 185/55 R13s to a couple of Golds and have found differences in overall diameter between different brands, but this is not uncommon I'm told.
The clearance issue is a matter of diameter, width and also how "square" the shoulders are.
I had no clearance problems with a set of 185/55 Dunlops, but these are now out of production sadly. However, I found Camac Aurigas in that size would touch the rear of the arch, but only in the most extreme circumstances - i.e. full lock and braking.
I have not tried the Toyo Roadpro's in 185/55 R13 so I don't know if they are okay or not. Anyone tried them?
Other options that I have seen used are 165/55 R13 and 165/65 R13.
The old 165/55 R13 were theoretically 528mm diameter.
185/55 R13 ~ 534mm
165/55 R13 ~ 512mm
165/65 R13 ~ 545mm
175/50 R13 ~ 505mm
These are the theoretical diameters and in practice I have seen differences of 12mm in diameter from one brand to another, but then again you will see that sort of variation between a new and a fully worn tyre.
The 165/65 R13 probably offer the biggest choice in brands, whereas supplies of the 185/55 R13 are already becoming patchy.
One last comment, I see elsewhere that you will need to IVA your car. In which case I would recommend leaving the purchase of any tyres until the last minute and then finding somewhere to give your car a shakedown run to take the shine off them. I have heard of two cases where cars had problems with the SVA/IVA rear brake tests as the tyres were not gripping the rollers - not helped by them being so light at the rear; one with unused tyres that had been on the car for 5 years before the IVA test and another with brand new tyres that still had their just moulded shine on them. In the latter case the examiner was good enough to take the car for the road-test/speedo check run and then do the brake test again, but in the former case the owner had to fit new tyres for a re-test.
Alistair