The ring Decathlon

Stuart · Post by **Stuart** » Fri Mar 25, 2011 8:55 pm

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/MG-MINI-MIDAS-Bro ... 2a0f432e9f

Rich · Post by **Rich** » Fri Mar 25, 2011 9:34 pm

That's a nice looking car.

Stuart · Post by **Stuart** » Sun Mar 27, 2011 7:30 pm

and only on the road for 4 years

d.woodspeed · Post by **d.woodspeed** » Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm

Very impressive, inspiration for me to re-motivate myself for my recently neglected Decathlon!
Dave.

manifold · Post by **manifold** » Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:21 pm

Impressive price in EBAY too. I hope it keeps it up!

manifold · Post by **manifold** » Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:31 pm

Why would an existing Midas registered and originally built around 1989 and then rebuilt in 2007 need to be SVA'd.

I don't see anything unusual in that car that makes me think it has been majorly modified to warrant an SVA????

Stuart · Post by **Stuart** » Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:35 pm

manifold wrote:Why would an existing Midas registered and originally built around 1989 and then rebuilt in 2007 need to be SVA'd.

I don't see anything unusual in that car that makes me think it has been majorly modified to warrant an SVA????

Ah but it took 20 years to be built!

manifold · Post by **manifold** » Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:44 pm

so was it not originally registered in 89?

Stuart · Post by **Stuart** » Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:52 pm

manifold wrote:so was it not originally registered in 89?

I'd say not, it looks like just a very slow build to me, if it had been registered in 1989 I doubt very much anyone would have SVA'd it if they didn't have to.

manifold · Post by **manifold** » Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:00 pm

OK fair enough. The way I read it made me think it was reregistered...hence my question.

Midas Cars Forum - www.midascarsforum.com

The ring Decathlon

The ring Decathlon

Re: The ring Decathlon

Re: The ring Decathlon

Re: The ring Decathlon

Re: The ring Decathlon

Re: The ring Decathlon

Re: The ring Decathlon

Re: The ring Decathlon

Re: The ring Decathlon

Re: The ring Decathlon